<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Something New to Sing About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linebreak.org/blog/2009/11/23/something-new-to-sing-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linebreak.org/blog/2009/11/23/something-new-to-sing-about/</link>
	<description>A weblog from the editors of Linebreak</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:24:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://linebreak.org/blog/2009/11/23/something-new-to-sing-about/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linebreak.org/blog/?p=1462#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Ashley -

You can&#039;t make a new subject appear, I don&#039;t believe, and if you do, it will ring false (won&#039;t it?).
&#039;Subject&#039; itself seems like the wrong way to consider lyric poetry; maybe dramatic or narrative, but not lyric.
For me, frogs in a shoebox (not enough time to atone), and mosquito hawks on the wing.
RA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashley -</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t make a new subject appear, I don&#8217;t believe, and if you do, it will ring false (won&#8217;t it?).<br />
&#8216;Subject&#8217; itself seems like the wrong way to consider lyric poetry; maybe dramatic or narrative, but not lyric.<br />
For me, frogs in a shoebox (not enough time to atone), and mosquito hawks on the wing.<br />
RA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://linebreak.org/blog/2009/11/23/something-new-to-sing-about/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linebreak.org/blog/?p=1462#comment-734</guid>
		<description>As a fine poet once told me, we writers have the luxury of following our obsessions, or, in the words of Ben Kweller, &quot;Stick to love songs, kid, that&#039;s all you&#039;re knowin&#039;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a fine poet once told me, we writers have the luxury of following our obsessions, or, in the words of Ben Kweller, &#8220;Stick to love songs, kid, that&#8217;s all you&#8217;re knowin&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Nienow</title>
		<link>http://linebreak.org/blog/2009/11/23/something-new-to-sing-about/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Nienow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linebreak.org/blog/?p=1462#comment-733</guid>
		<description>I think this topic is timeless.  It seems, though, that if a poet or writer or musician is doing the good work of writing/composing often, reading/listening new work, and living in the world, the work should change.  I&#039;m still interested in many of the same things I started writing about seven years ago, but they come out differently now even if there is a common voice at the core.  

I&#039;ve even received encouragement (especially for the sake of a ms.) to dig back into a certain topic and write even more poems of the same focus.  

Generally, I think a couple of problems lie in the way: 

One, being reluctance to change due to fear of how new work will be accepted (or because one thing/style/voice was so well praised that the author feels compelled to continue the pattern...

Victoria Chang talks about this same topic from a slightly different angle in a recent post here: (http://bit.ly/8A8fV0).

So many of us write because we feel called to.  At the same time, many of us are working to be &quot;career poets&quot; of some sort—that is, to find success in this lifetime.  But I think it is important to keep in mind that if we are to be remembered at all it will most likely be for one or two poems.

I say keep writing what you love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this topic is timeless.  It seems, though, that if a poet or writer or musician is doing the good work of writing/composing often, reading/listening new work, and living in the world, the work should change.  I&#8217;m still interested in many of the same things I started writing about seven years ago, but they come out differently now even if there is a common voice at the core.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve even received encouragement (especially for the sake of a ms.) to dig back into a certain topic and write even more poems of the same focus.  </p>
<p>Generally, I think a couple of problems lie in the way: </p>
<p>One, being reluctance to change due to fear of how new work will be accepted (or because one thing/style/voice was so well praised that the author feels compelled to continue the pattern&#8230;</p>
<p>Victoria Chang talks about this same topic from a slightly different angle in a recent post here: (<a href="http://bit.ly/8A8fV0" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8A8fV0</a>).</p>
<p>So many of us write because we feel called to.  At the same time, many of us are working to be &#8220;career poets&#8221; of some sort—that is, to find success in this lifetime.  But I think it is important to keep in mind that if we are to be remembered at all it will most likely be for one or two poems.</p>
<p>I say keep writing what you love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

