The paradox of blogging: when we are doing the most we could write about, we have the least time to write about it. Today I spent 90 minutes in front of an undergraduate class, answering questions. To walk into a room of 35 students and see your book sitting in front of each of them is a bit staggering.
If I were a more poised person, perhaps I would have decided long ago which were my vetted, “safe” answers for interviews, and which were answers to steer from. But instead I tend to answer things on a gut-level. Which makes for quick turnaround. And answers that will possibly haunt me in my old age. Some things I learned from my own Q&A:
-The second section of my book has discernible anger. I’m secretly proud of this, actually. There should be more anger in poems. This also elicited the quotation (on the topic of heightened rhetoric) “I’ve never actually asked anyone to make the bitch of me in a relationship…”
-If you use someone’s proper name in a poem, readers notice.
-Clarity is a good thing. No need to apologize for it. It doesn’t mean your poem is a simpler poem, or a less-beautiful poem.
-My favorites from the book are other people’s favorites.
-If you like my book too much, i.e. multiple re-readings, the cover may split away from the interior pages. Ack.
-In every audience, there is that one person who really, truly, wants to talk about sonnets and sestinas.
-If they ask if you want a chair, don’t bother. If you start out on your feet, you’ll stay on your feet.
The questions were great, though–quirky, engaged, genuine. When everyone has read a common text you can make very detailed references. To ensure everyone had read the text (no offense, but we’re talking undergrads, just getting back into a school year), the professor had actually given a quiz on my book the week before. A quiz! I suppose the key would be asking for analysis of the objective factual/mythological elements (Orpheus, those barrel-bound folks going over Niagara Falls), versus asking “So, do you think the speaker actually cheated on her boyfriend?”
When the conversation veered toward the dividing lines between private and public narrative, I told the students that any contemporary, American first-book poet who doesn’t admit to the litmus test of “Will this book make my mother cry?” is lying. I also said I hate prompts, rebel against prompts, think that prompts render the poem not-entirely-mine, and therefore useless to me, nine times out of ten. Prompts are the lifeblood of the undergrad workshop. Filter. Must. Learn. To. Filter.
My payment for the visit was a bottle of water. It is a glamorous life I lead. I came home to see my book reviewed in the latest copy of Allergic Living. That’s right: I’m next to What Else to Eat: The Dairy-, Egg-, and Nut-Free Food Allergy Cookbook. They photoshopped my cover art onto a generic “book” template for the illustration, which means it looks like Theories of Falling came out in hardback. Not that I am complaining. There are thousands of copies of this magazines out there, on the waiting-room table of your local doctors’ offices. Who knows? I could become a Christmas gift.
After touching down to pick up mail from home, it was off an evening titled “Rise Up and Hear: Honoring Abraham Lincoln’s Legacy.” Cosponsored by the NEA and the Poetry Foundation; hosted at the Department of the Interior. Featuring readings by Dana Gioia, Robert Pinsky, Kevin Young, and (this is where it gets surreal) Joan Allen and Sam Waterston. Poems Lincoln either loved–or inspired–by Vachel Lindsay, Walt Whitman, Carl Sandburg, and so on.
Free wine. Sculpted, dramatic auditorium. Classy reading. But I have to say, which gave me more buck for my day in terms of poetry? Those 35 students in an Indian-Summer-hot classroom. Bottle of water in hand.